Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 08:28

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
The Nintendo Switch 2 is available online at Best Buy (update: sold out) - The Verge
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Scientists Discover Mysterious Human Lineage with No Descendants - The Daily Galaxy
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What are the downsides of OpenAI's chain-of-thought approach in the o1 model?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
UNC Pours It On Arizona in Opener, Piles Up Super Regional Record - 247Sports
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Common herbal supplement used to beat stress linked to liver toxicity - Times of India
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Are LGBT people accepted in Japan?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Colorado confirms 3 more infections in airport-linked measles outbreak - CIDRAP